Negative Gearing Means Losing Money
Negative gearing is getting some bad press lately
Nobody in Australia wants to be negatively geared and no-one has a goal of being negatively geared, because negative gearing means losing money and no-one sets out to lose money.
Suppose you have $100,000 in the bank (lucky you). You want to invest this money for your financial future, so you decide to buy a rental property which is for sale for $500,000. Your cash purchasing power is, obviously, $100,000. You can gear your purchasing power up several notches by borrowing $400,000, so your purchasing power is now $500,000.
This is gearing.
Negative gearing is when the interest on your loan is greater than the net income from your rental property.
Suppose you charge $20,800 rent per year. Your expenses for rates, insurance, pest control, repairs etc. total $5,800 per year so your net income is $15000. The interest charged on your $400,000 loan at 7% is $28,000, so your loss for the year is $13,000.
At present, you can claim this $13,000 as a tax deduction, saving perhaps $4,000 tax. Even after this tax saving, you are still losing $9,000.
As you can see by these results, nobody would set negative gearing as a goal. The only reason why you would use negative gearing is because you hope that when you have finally paid off the loan, you will own an asset which is likely to increase in value or which will provide you with a positive income stream. Even then, it is a long, hard haul to get to that stage.
The Government at present is putting out feelers about abolishing negative gearing as a tax deduction. The inference is that negative gearing is some kind of tax dodge. It is not. It is a costly means to an end. Would you ever ring the bank to ask it to increase your interest rate so you can be more negatively geared? Of course not.
Rents are far too high in Australia, but the reason is the cost of a houses, not negative gearing. The landlord and the tenant are both suffering. If the landlord has to pay an additional $4000 tax because negative gearing deductions have been abolished, he is going to try to recover it from the tenant. In the end, landlord and tenant will both be a little worse off.










