Depreciation De-mystified

Lionel Walsh • March 9, 2025

Depreciation De-mystified

Depreciation De-mystified


Thor Clift purchased a forklift for $20,000. At the end of the year, his bookkeeper Ima Sinner, who was a beginner, said to Thor “You expected to make a profit of $30,000 but you only made a profit of $10,000 because you bought that forklift”.


This made poor Thor Clift sore. “Wait a minute” said he, “that forklift is going to last 20 years and you have charged the full cost against the first year. That makes my performance look much worse than it really is. That’s not fair. You should spread the cost over 20 years”.


“Well, said Sinner the Beginner “What am I going to call it, perhaps Forklift – 1/20th?


Thor said “No. Its value depreciates each year so let’s call it by a generic name “depreciation”, then we can also use that name for every asset.


This is the way depreciation was born and the way it is still used to day, and it is quite logical and easy to understand.


Then, some seriously intelligent accountants said “In addition to using depreciation to spread the cost of the forklift over its useful life, we can also use it to let Thor know how much it might cost him to replace the forklift at the end of its useful life”.


This is not so simple. First, Thor has to decide whether he will still be in business in 20 years. Then he has to decide whether he will still need a forklift at that stage. He needs to forecast whether technological advances might make forklifts more efficient at less cost or even obsolete. Then there is inflation to estimate. If, in the end, he decides that, on balance, he probably will need a replacement forklift, how much will it cost him?


Let’s assume that, after doing all their forecasts, predictions and estimations, the seriously intelligent accountants inform Thor that in 20 years’ time, he will need $45,000 to replace the forklift. Make no mistake, this is useful information, but it does nothing to produce the $45,000. It is a message.


At this stage, depreciation has done its job. Thor has been properly forewarned. Now it is up to him to work out how he is going to fund the forklift, but at least he will not get a nasty surprise in 20 years’ time.


Then, along comes the Australian Government. It realises that it has the power to influence the flow of money in the economy by increasing depreciation rates (less taxes) or reducing depreciation rates (more taxes). This has nothing to do with the reality of useful lives.


So, there you have the three uses of depreciation



·        to spread the cost of an asset over its useful life,

·        to give management the forecast it needs to prepare for the future or

·        to increase or reduce taxes.


By Jamie Walsh June 8, 2025
Family Trust Elections – How to avoid the 47% tax rate If your family trust has made a Family Trust Election, please read this.
By Jamie Walsh June 3, 2025
Banks can create money
By Jamie Walsh May 21, 2025
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Jamie Walsh May 21, 2025
Labor's $1,000 instant tax deduction aims to simplify claiming work-related deductions As promised in its election campaign, the Labor Government may introduce a $1,000 instant tax deduction for work-related expenses from the 2026–27 income year. Simplifying claiming work-related deductions The proposed measure will allow taxpayers to choose to claim a $1,000 instant tax deduction instead of claiming individual work-related expenses. Taxpayers who choose to claim this instant deduction will not be required to collect receipts for deductions less than $1,000 in total. Eligibility To be eligible for the instant tax deduction: a taxpayer must earn labour income for example salaries and wages a taxpayer must not exclusively earn business or investment income. Taxpayers who earn business or investment income may continue to claim their tax deductions in the usual way. Other deductions Charitable donations and other non-work related deductions would continue to be claimed on top of this instant tax deduction. This concession will be welcomed by many workers, but it does not seem to make sense from the Government point of view. If a taxpayer has under $1,000 in deductions, he or she can choose the $1,000 deduction. If the actual deductions are more than $1,000 he or she will naturally claim the higher amount. From the ATO point of view, this seems to be a case of "Heads the taxpayer wins and tails we lose". The concession is not peanuts. it is expected to increase tax refunds by $2.4 billion "over the forward estimates" which is code for the next three years, but as it does not start until 2026-27 tax returns, that appears to translate to $1.4 billion per year. Perhaps we should not get to excited until we see the wording of the actual legislation. Contact Us Have queries? We are here to help you navigate through them, please feel free get in contact with us.
By Jamie Walsh April 8, 2025
Here’s the lowdown on the new Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code and what it means for your business.
By Jamie Walsh March 20, 2025
Concessional and Non-Concessional Super Contributions Explained
By Jamie Walsh March 20, 2025
The Backbone of Every Business: The Unsung Heroes in Admin
By Jamie Walsh March 7, 2025
What Are Concessional Contributions?
By Jamie Walsh March 7, 2025
What Are Non-Concessional Contributions?
By Jamie Walsh March 7, 2025
Super Guarantee and Freedom of Choice of Super Fund
More Posts